hello guys,
here is the reply i've got from sigma usa, stil does not give a proper answer for the hotspot.
Cheers!
Janson
Dear Janson
Thank you for your inquiry. The F2.8 lens may be more susceptible to glare caused by strong light sources, (e.g. Sun, etc.) striking or directly or entering the front of the lens, but we have heard no reports of excessive IR hot spots being experienced with either of these lenses. Remember that digital camera sensors are very sensitive to IR light, and most is filtered out with IR cut-off filters, etc. If you intend to do IR photography, we don’t know how effectively you can do this with your digital camera. But, Good Luck! And remember to use your lens hood and to remove any unnecessary filters form the lens.
Sincerely
SCA
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: Sigma Customer Services [mailto:cchurana@sigmaphoto.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 11, 2005 1:50 PM
To: tsobey@sigmaphoto.com
Subject: FW: IR avalibility
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: Sim, Janson [mailto:Janson.Sim@BHPBilliton.com]
Sent: Monday, October 10, 2005 3:09 AM
To: info@sigmaphoto.com
Subject: IR avalibility
Hi There,
I am interested to purchase some of your lens namely the
Sigma 18 - 50 mm F2.8 or the cheeper 18 - 50 F3.5 or 18 - 200 F3.5 for my Canon 350D. However I've read in several forum that there might be IR hotspots in photos for some of the lens. It would be great if the team at sigma could confirm if there would be any hotspot problem with any of the lens listed above when used on a 350D and with a IR filter on?